Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to establish a computer-aided automated method for cephalometric superimposition and to evaluate the accuracy of this method based on free-hand tracing.MethodsTwenty-eight pairs of pre-treatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cephalograms were selected. Structural superimpositions of the anterior cranial base, maxilla and mandible were independently completed by three operators performing traditional hand tracing methods and by computerized automation using the feature matching algorithm. To quantitatively evaluate the differences between the two methods, the hand superimposed patterns were digitized. After automated and hand superimposition of T2 cephalograms to T1 cephalometric templates, landmark distances between paired automated and hand T2 cephalometric landmarks were measured. Differences in hand superimposition among the operators were also calculated.ResultsThe T2 landmark differences in hand tracing between the operators ranged from 0.61 mm to 1.65 mm for the three types of superimposition. There were no significant differences in accuracy between hand and automated superimposition (p > 0.05).ConclusionsComputer-aided cephalometric superimposition provides comparably accurate results to those of traditional hand tracing and will provide a powerful tool for academic research.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to establish a computer-aided automated method for cephalometric superimposition and to evaluate the accuracy of this method based on free-hand tracing

  • The reason for this exception lies in the fact that landmark identification is accomplished using commercial software, while structural superimposition focuses on the tracing of structural details, which is independent of landmarks and is still not feasible using current commercial software

  • The mean T2 landmark distances (T2LDs) between operators on the anterior cranial base, maxilla and mandible superimposition methods are listed in Tables 1, 2 and 3, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this study was to establish a computer-aided automated method for cephalometric superimposition and to evaluate the accuracy of this method based on free-hand tracing. The traditional method of cephalometric analysis is hand tracing the craniofacial soft and hard anatomic structural contours on cephalograms on acetate paper. This process is subjective, and the accuracy varies with personal. Jiang et al BMC Medical Imaging (2020) 20:31 and growth study, much effort has been made in this field [3, 12,13,14] The reason for this exception lies in the fact that landmark identification is accomplished using commercial software, while structural superimposition focuses on the tracing of structural details, which is independent of landmarks and is still not feasible using current commercial software

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call