Abstract

OPINION article Front. Psychol., 26 April 2013Sec. Language Sciences Volume 4 - 2013 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00236

Highlights

  • In 2006, I gave a series of lectures in Paris arguing for a set of rather general strategies governing language production

  • Hawkins, which argues that many morphosyntactic properties of languages can be explained in terms of how they facilitate processing

  • I have always felt uncomfortable about a number of the particular processing strategies Hawkins proposed, because they struck me as too focused on the problem of parsing—that is, on comprehension

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2006, I gave a series of lectures in Paris arguing for a set of rather general strategies governing language production. A theory that relies too heavily on comprehension-based considerations to explain properties of languages must assume that speakers design their utterances primarily to accommodate their audience’s needs, rather than their own. I argued that ambiguity avoidance plays a much smaller role in shaping language structure than is generally assumed.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call