The apparent Km is a misleading kinetic indicator.

Abstract

When information concerning whether or not a ligand interacts with the same enzyme species as do the substrates, the variation of the Michaelis constant Km (for each substrate) with ligand concentration is sometimes used as a diagnostic. It is shown that the Michaelis constant is of no particular value in this respect and may be misleading. Thus, depending on the mechanism, Km may vary with ligand concentration even though the ligand interacts with species far removed in the mechanism from the substrate-binding steps, and it may stay constant in cases where the ligand competes directly for the free enzyme. In contrast, the slope of a double-reciprocal plot of the kinetic data (= Km/Vmax.) (or, equivalently, the ordinate intercept of a Hanes plot A/v versus A, where A is the substrate concentration) independently of the particular mechanism involved uniquely signifies whether or not such interaction occurs. The results clearly indicate that, for purposes other than communicating the substrate concentration yielding control of the enzymic activity, usage of Km and its variation with ligand concentration should be avoided and interest instead focused on the slope, in accordance with the long-established rules of Cleland [Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1963) 67, 188-196], for which the present analysis provides the formal framework.