Abstract
The apparatus of early modern and modern science, from singular specimens to large artifact classes, beckon archaeological research. We can ask a host of archaeological and historical questions and seek answers with the aid of behavioral concepts, generalizations, and heuristic tools applied to apparatus. The examples in this chapter include (1) life history narratives and Otto von Guericke’s “electrical machine,” (2) assessing the cognitive equivalence between Michael Faraday’s “motor” and Joseph Henry’s “teeter-totter,” (3) studying the design of museum artifacts, with a focus on Thomas Davenport’s electric motor, (4) treating project apparatus as an artifact assemblage (Du Fay and the law of charges; Humphry Davy and the discovery of chemical elements), and (5) functional differentiation in a class of apparatus, the eighteenth-century electrical machine.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.