Abstract
This article develops an account of ontological security of the state as constituted by endless pursuits of discursive totality. Grounded in discussions on state’s ontology, Lacanian and postcolonial insights, the article advances an account of state’s ontological security as predicated upon a totalising but perpetually contingent discourse that reifies itself through ideational order and foreclosure of alternatives. Discursive totality obtains for the state its ontological security by layering social reality to bury its original lack and fixing signifiers in particular, exclusive ways, which must be continually maintained due to the discourse’ very contingency. The case of Vietnam’s ‘syncretic socialism’ and its continual rearticulations in response to different political ruptures embody this ‘anxious state’ always on the move to (re)enclose social terrain within its discourse. The maintenance of discursive totality rests upon syncretic socialism’s capacity to extend itself by rearranging or incorporating signifiers and keep contingency at bay by foreclosing alternatives.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
