Abstract
In this chapter I will describe the controversy that exists concerning the interpretation of the antinomy of reflective judgment and argue for a unitary reading of the Dialectic of Teleological Judgment. I will connect my reading to an account of the antinomy of judgments of taste in the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. In doing so, I will present a detailed response to Werner Pluhar’s interpretation of the relation between the Antinomies of Taste and Teleological Judgment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
