Abstract
The ether antigen ofFrancisella tularensis was fractionated using DEAE-cellulose and CM-cellulose chromatography, and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration. The CM-cellulose chromatography did not appear to be a suitable method for separation of individual components of the complex ether antigen. Most of the polysaccharide material and substances with a high phosphorus content were eluted already in the first peak of the elution curve. This method could be used only to separate a component, yielding one immunoelectrophoretic precipitin line, localized towards the cathode. On the other hand, the DEAE-cellulose chromatography, and particularly the Sephadex G-200 gel filtration (especially when recycling was introduced), yielded a clear separation of relatively clean components of the ether antigen. The present work provides a comparison between the immunochemical (immunoelectrophoretic) properties of fractions obtained by these methods and components isolated by salting out with ammonium sulphate, ethanol or trichloracetic acid precipitation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
