Abstract

The Social Security earnings test reform in 2000 eliminated the earnings test for all individuals between the normal retirement age (NRA) and age sixty-nine. The earnings test has long been accused of imposing a disincentive on the labor supply among older workers. In this article, we argue that the policy change may also have affected the labor supply among people who were just below the NRA around 2000. We utilize approaches embedded with a difference-in-differences design to estimate the anticipation effect on the labor supply of the slightly younger group (aged sixty-two to sixty-four) using an even younger cohort as the control group. Our preferred estimates indicate that the cohort aged sixty-two to sixty-four had worked 5.4 percent more weeks per year and 5.1 percent more hours per week after the earnings test reform in 2000.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.