Abstract
Certain federal civil rights statutes allow proof of discrimination based on disparate-impact even though violations of the constitutional provisions that authorize the statutes also require proof of discriminatory intent. This is the anti-discrimination paradox.The purpose of this article is to analyze the decisions of the United States Supreme court that underlay the anti-discrimination paradox. These cases reveal that Congress has authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to prohibit discriminatory conduct by statute that seeks to prevent or remedy violations of the substantive provisions of these constitutional amendments.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
