Abstract
Is it possible to get away from the distinction between physical space and lived space, where the former is conceived as material, objective, and measurable, and the latter is conceived as historical, subjective, and symbolic? In other words, is it possible to get out of the division of labour between physical geography and human geography? Such a proposition is different from wanting to ‘reconcile’ or ‘bring together’ the two branches of geography. In this response to Stuart Elden’s (2021) article, ‘Terrain, Politics, History’, my proposal is that a distinction must be made elsewhere between terrestrial space – which does not mean physical – and extraterrestrial space – which does not mean subjective.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
