Abstract
Background and aim:Recently a modification of the DAA in lateral decubitus, called ALDI, has been proposed to obtain a better surgical exposure than DAA in supine decubitus and it easier for surgeons accustomed to the posterolateral (PLA) or direct lateral approach. The aim of this paper was to report our early experience with the ALDI approach for THA and to compare outcomes between ALDI and PLA in a retrospective investigation.Methods:From September 2017 to January 2020 we have identified all patients who received THA through the ALDI approach and through the PLA. We collected patients demographic, clinical (HHS and HOOS) and radiographic data by our electronic hospital database. The ALDI group included 60 hips and the PLA group included 219 hips. These patients underwent to strict follow-up in the first 3 post-operative months.Results:Compared to the PLA, the ALDI approach showed clinical outcomes significantly higher in the first month of follow-up. The PLA group has a lower operative time and a greater mean hospital length of stay. No blood transfusions were administered in the ALDI group while the 1.4% of patients in the PLA group needed blood transfusion. Cup anteversion and inclination angles were significantly wider in the PLA group. THA dislocation occurred in seven patients of the PLA group. No femoral cutaneus nerve palsy was recorded in the ALDI group.Conclusions:The ALDI approach can represent a quickly and safe solution for surgeons who are accustomed to the PLA who want to perform THA in DAA. Our preliminary experience has shown encouraging outcomes in terms of clinical and radiographic parameters although the operative time needs to be improved. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.