Abstract
<b>José María Arguedas (1911-1969) was one of the most notable Peruvian writers of the 20th century. He was a prose writer, poet, anthropologist and translator who wrote in both Spanish and Quechua, the main Indigenous language spoken in the Andean region where he was born and raised. Throughout his career, he was driven by the desire to defend and diffuse Peruvian Quechua culture and to convince his readers of its extraordinary value for the future of Peru. </b><p>Arguedas’s narrative fiction is considered part of a literary tradition known as indigenismo, which developed in Latin American countries with large Indigenous populations. However, because his work overcomes many of the limitations of this tradition by incorporating elements of Quechua culture into the form of his novels and short stories, it has also been categorised as neoindigenismo. </p><p><br></p> Arguedas’s texts have been a source of inspiration for several Latin American literary and cultural critics. Concerned with the region’s overreliance on Eurocentric theories produced for and from literatures emanating from contexts with distinct socio-cultural and historical particularities, these intellectuals have established critical concepts and frameworks that facilitate the study of literature produced in Latin America. Their concepts, such as narrative transculturation and literary heterogeneity, are particularly useful for examining literatures which, because of a historical event such as the Conquest of America, are embedded in fractured societies in which two or more socio-cultural groups struggle to coexist. These critical frameworks enable the identification and interpretation of the plurality of specificities that underpin narratives such as Arguedas’s, especially those that are associated with Indigenous or popular cultures.<div><br>The concerns regarding the transposition of supposedly universal critical apparatuses to the Latin American milieu that motivated these critics are shared by more recent academics who foreground the bypassing of scholarship produced in peripheral regions in favour of that produced in metropolitan academic centres as an issue that occurs across several academic disciplines. These critics stress that in doing so, scholars risk misinterpreting or overlooking the particularities of Latin American literature, as well as denying Latin American institutions their role as producers of knowledge. Indeed, this has been the case in some studies of Arguedian narrative. The approach adopted in this study is a response to these tendencies. It analyses Arguedas visual poetics first and foremost by critically engaging with Latin American or Latin Americanist literary and cultural criticism.<br> <b><br></b></div><div>Critics have celebrated Arguedas for his unique writing style and particularly for the way he wove Quechua music, song and lyricism into his texts. Focus on his incorporation of Andean orality has meant that scant critical attention has been paid to his representation of the visual. This study seeks to develop upon the Latin American(ist) scholarship that establishes Andean Indigenous and mestizo culture as a subversive element in Arguedas’s texts by examining the way he draws on visual conceptualisations of Peruvian Quechua culture to construct a transcultural visual poetics that contributes to the counter-hegemonic nature of his socio-political literary project. <p><br></p><p>Arguably, common understandings of the visual as a predominantly Western mode of perception and of many Indigenous cultures as ‘oral cultures’ have influenced critics’ tendencies to focus on Arguedas’s use of sound as the primary counter-hegemonic force in his narratives. But Indigenous Andean culture has a complex visual tradition that is a fundamental part of its sensory order and worldview. With the invasion of America, many elements of this visual tradition were overridden as the Spanish, and then criollo, colonial project enforced a new visual order. However, there is a considerable amount of scholarship that documents the numerous aspects of Andean visuality. Drawing upon historical accounts, Andean ethnohistory and anthropology of the senses, this study explores the connections between Arguedas’s treatment of the visual, the Andean visual tradition and the Quechua worldview. By taking this approach to Arguedas’s work, the study aims to demonstrate that the visual is not only a Western mode of perception, that there is no universal concept of the visual sense and that, in his endeavour to faithfully represent Quechua culture and to subvert Western writing styles, Arguedas drew upon Andean visuality just as much as he drew upon its orality. </p></div>
Highlights
In 1962, José María Arguedas published a poem, which he wrote in Quechua and translated into Spanish
In the early 1930s, whilst attending university in Lima, José María Arguedas began to read novels and short stories pertaining to the literary current known as indigenismo
When Arguedas declared his fervent desire to represent Quechua culture in fiction so that costeños would see the beauty and value that he knew it to possess, this meant portraying it in all its dimensions, including its complex visuality
Summary
In 1962, José María Arguedas published a poem, which he wrote in Quechua and translated into Spanish. Despite the wealth of evidence that supports the claim that Arguedas was culturally mestizo, as explained in the introduction Rama’s writing at times suggests that the writer’s knowledge of Indigenous Andean culture was obtained through his contact with Andeans as an ethnographer and that by way of this academic role, he gained enough understanding of the Quechua thought system to be able to create characters who adhere to it This assumption downplays the extent to which Arguedas’s perception of the world was influenced by the Quechua cosmocentric perspective. 32 Arguedas revealed the extent of his indigenised worldview in the conversations that took place during the Primer Encuentro de Narradores Peruanos, declaring, ‘yo hasta ahora les confieso con toda honradez, con toda honestidad, no puedo creer que un río no sea un hombre tan vivo como yo mismo’ (Arguedas, as cited in Casa de la Cultura del Perú 1969: 108) Another assertion of his Quechua identity can be found in his 1939 article ‘Entre el kechwa y el castellano. The writer himself confirmed this on many occasions, insisting that his view of the world was permanently infused with Quechua ways of thinking
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.