Abstract
This article, which is in two parts, takes a new look at how the 1950 Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China shaped family dynamics in rural areas between 1949 and 1966. In contrast to previous studies which have depicted the law (which banned arranged marriages, bigamy, concubinage and made it easier to divorce, among other things) as ineffectual in changing family relations, and rural society as basically stable and patriarchal throughout this period, this article demonstrates that Chinese peasants, women in particular, clamoured to take advantage of many of the law's articles, particularly those expanding the right to divorce. This happened even as many women and men still held what we would consider ‘traditional’ views towards the sexual division of labour. The result of the law, in combination with other state policies (such as collectivization and the famine after the Great Leap Forward), was a notable shift in power away from family elders and village men towards young women, who sometimes used their rights to a ‘free love’ marriage and divorce to pursue goals the state considered quite unorthodox. Rather than emphasize stability and patriarchy, this article argues for a reconceptualization of law-induced social change in China that emphasizes fluidity and power shifts. This case of family change in rural China also suggests that there is little incompatibility between an understanding of sexual inequality as the natural order of things and the willingness to take an active role in changing one's family situation. Achieving gender ‘equality’, a principle concern of western feminists and often the criteria by which they judge women's progress in the Third World, was not a precondition for social change in the rural Chinese family. Part One deals primarily with the revolutionary period and Part Two with the period of consolidation of the revolution and the impact of collectivization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.