Abstract

Abstract This study compared junior high school science textbooks to media reports of science, on the basis of four textual characteristics: text type, truth status of statements, metalanguage use, and scientific status of statements and their role in scientific reasoning. The text type of both junior high science textbooks and media reports of science was found to be overwhelmingly expository. There was no argumentation in junior high science textbooks, a finding similar for some of the media reports of science, but vastly different for others, which had considerable argumentation. Almost all statements in the junior high science textbooks were presented as being true. In media reports of science, by contrast, only two thirds of the statements were presented as true. The junior high science textbooks reflected a range of metalanguage use largely limited to observational words, words that describe the process of doing research, and relational words, such as ‘cause.’ The frequency of metalanguage use was o...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call