Abstract

To infer the causes of its sensations, the brain must call on a generative (predictive) model. This necessitates passing local messages between populations of neurons to update beliefs about hidden variables in the world beyond its sensory samples. It also entails inferences about how we will act. Active inference is a principled framework that frames perception and action as approximate Bayesian inference. This has been successful in accounting for a wide range of physiological and behavioral phenomena. Recently, a process theory has emerged that attempts to relate inferences to their neurobiological substrates. In this paper, we review and develop the anatomical aspects of this process theory. We argue that the form of the generative models required for inference constrains the way in which brain regions connect to one another. Specifically, neuronal populations representing beliefs about a variable must receive input from populations representing the Markov blanket of that variable. We illustrate this idea in four different domains: perception, planning, attention, and movement. In doing so, we attempt to show how appealing to generative models enables us to account for anatomical brain architectures. Ultimately, committing to an anatomical theory of inference ensures we can form empirical hypotheses that can be tested using neuroimaging, neuropsychological, and electrophysiological experiments.

Highlights

  • This paper is based upon the notion that brain function can be framed as Bayesian inference (Kersten et al, 2004; Knill and Pouget, 2004)

  • This article has focused on some very specific but ubiquitous features of computational anatomy that emerge under a factor graph treatment—with special attention to known neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neuropsychology

  • We have emphasized the idea that generative models, and their constituent Markov blankets, represent a useful way to express hypotheses about brain connectivity

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This paper is based upon the notion that brain function can be framed as Bayesian inference (Kersten et al, 2004; Knill and Pouget, 2004). As discussed in the section Generative models and Markov blankets partition functions are a way of summarizing part of a graphical model and may be approximated by a free energy functional This suggests we can perform inference by passing messages in the subgraph within the dashed lines, computing posterior beliefs about the constituent variables conditioned upon a behavioral policy. In addition to providing a computational hypothesis for basal ganglia function that formalizes the notion that they are engaged in planning (i.e., policy evaluation), we can refine the cortical anatomy of Figure 4 to include the signals required to compute the expected free energy in the striatum (Friston et al, 2017c).

DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call