Abstract
The nineteenth-century laws under which Australian medical schools obtained bodies for their students to dissect were deliberately vague on certain matters. Significantly, they failed to define the meaning of the term ‘anatomical examination’, the practice that they were regulating. Was this confined to dissecting a corpse for medical training, or did it bring within the realm of law the multitude of activities that medical men undertook on the dead? This article analyses an important 1903 South Australian government inquiry in which the meaning of this contentious term assumed centre stage, during a scandal that revealed exactly what was being done to the bodies of people whose deaths had been the subject of coronial enquiries, or who had died in Adelaide’s asylums and its hospital. This article has been peer-reviewed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
