Abstract

The analysis examines the governmental decisions that tried to provide alternatives and offer a realistic response to the current U.S. debt crisis, severely undermining those defense budget provisions that had previously been planned. First, the impact of the 2011 Budget Control Act and the ‘sequestration’ process will be examined within the context of U.S. defense planning, giving a comprehensive overview of the U.S. budget debate with regard to U.S defense policy. Then the analysis compares and contrasts the current 2013 financial year data to the 2014 financial plan proposal based on President Obama’s statement in the White House on April 10, 2013, in which he presented the key points of the 2014 financial year budget. There the President put an emphasis on his sustained effort to improve the situation of American people through social benefit programs. These will have a determining effect to the United States armed forces in the future, which operate under heavy pressure and at times financial austerity. Expenses of social welfare and medical care are important for our analysis, as these belong to more steady mandatory items of the federal budget, while the defense budget relies mostly on discretionary funding, and is subject to major fluctuations. Finally the assessment will reflect on the Obama administration’s FY 2014 proposals with regard to the US defense policy review process in order to highlight the practical effects of sequestration.

Highlights

  • The analysis examines the governmental decisions that tried to provide alternatives and offer a realistic response to the current U.S debt crisis, severely undermining those defense budget provisions that had previously been planned

  • The fiscal uncertainty that began in 2011 with the federal statute of the Budget Control Act (BCA) has only grown worse over time with the throw–back of the Super Committee, sequestration going into effect, and the government shutdown

  • That sequestration has begun and the sharpest decrease from Financial Year (FY) 2012 to FY 2013 has already taken place, the BCA budget caps may be more of a ceiling than floor in the coming years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The analysis examines the governmental decisions that tried to provide alternatives and offer a realistic response to the current U.S debt crisis, severely undermining those defense budget provisions that had previously been planned. The impact of the 2011 Budget Control Act and the ‘sequestration’ process will be examined within the context of U.S defense planning, giving a comprehensive overview of the U.S budget debate with regard to U.S defense policy. There the President put an emphasis on his sustained effort to improve the situation of American people through social benefit programs. These will have a determining effect to the United States armed forces in the future, which operate under heavy pressure and at times financial austerity. The assessment will reflect on the Obama administration’s FY 2014 proposals with regard to the US defense policy review process in order to highlight the practical effects of sequestration

The essence of the Budget Control Act and the sequestration process
Historical perspectives
Effects on the FY 2014 defense budget
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call