Abstract
Guiding involves verbal communication interactions and engages in complex cognitive aspects. The cognitive deviation between individuals during the guidance process of writing academic papers is a determining factor as well as differentiates the results of guiding. This study aimed to study the effects of academic procrastination on the scientific guidance process at the Postgraduate Program of UIN Alauddin Makassar. This study used quantitative and qualitative methods. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the quantitative data, and the descriptive qualitative data were analyzed using a responsive evaluation model developed by Robert Stake, which covered three main phases; antecedents, transactions, and outcomes. The research instruments were questionnaire and interview. The questionnaire used three aspects of procrastination standardized by Tuckman. Those three aspects were developed into 35 items of procrastination statements with answer choices using the Five-Point of Likert Scale; always, often, sometimes, rarely, and never. While semi structured-interview was used to gain additional data related to the students' writing academic guidance process. The research finding indicated that the academic procrastination on academic guidance was moderate so that the quality of students' academic works was relatively low. Therefore, The students' academic procrastination and the imperfect formal flow of guidance affect academic guidance process not run optimally. This study recommends that Postgraduate UIN Alauddin Makassar should compile guidelines for the writing of scientific papers that are applied exclusively to the needs of the guidance and reporting of scientific papers.
Highlights
Supervision of academic scientific work is one of the primary roles of lecturers' functional position, teaching, and research
Responsive criteria were based on how effective the guidance process for writing scientific papers was applied in the Postgraduate Program at UIN Alauddin Makassar [21]. This current research aimed to identify the effects of academic procrastination pattern on the scientific guidance process
The academic procrastination items divided into three aspects
Summary
Supervision of academic scientific work is one of the primary roles of lecturers' functional position, teaching, and research This role is relatively mutual because the supervisor and the supervisee are actively involved in processing a complete set of studies with various components. Symptoms are often found in the supervisor who complained about the guided subject's weakness in developing the results of their communication into the report structure, which is the output of the guiding activity. It reveals that the complexity of interactions in communication guiding requires more actions than just meeting and talking, namely through intensive communication.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
