Abstract

BackgroundLateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and bilateral percutaneous pedicle fixation are valuable, minimally invasive lateral approaches used to treat symptomatic degenerative disc disease. In the current procedure, the patient’s position on the operating table is changed after LLIF surgery from the lateral decubitus to the prone position. The ability to perform both approaches with the patient in the same position should reduce operation time. Use of a guide wire is problematic during percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion using fluoroscopy with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. A new guide wire-less PPS system may solve this problem and reduce operation time. Here, we evaluated the operative data and efficacy for this technique.MethodsThis study included 30 patients (aged 70.8 ± 8.5 years; 17 men, 13 women) who underwent a combined operation (indirect decompression) using extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) with only a single level for lumbar spinal canal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Patient demographics and operative data were compared between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation (L group) and those turned to the prone position (P group). Radiographic assessment was performed using pre- and postoperative anteroposterior and lateral lumbar films with measurement of lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, and segmental translation.ResultsWe analyzed 18 patients in the P group and 12 in the L group. Age, sex, height, body weight, body mass index, estimated blood loss, and length of stay did not differ between groups. The operation time was 34 min shorter for the L group (P group 111.9 ± 25.0 vs. L group 77.5 ± 22.2 min, p < 0.01). Pre- and postoperative lordosis, segmental lordosis, and segmental translation did not differ significantly between groups.ConclusionsA single position after XLIF surgery is a feasible modification to the standard procedure when used with fluoroscopy and a guide wire-less PPS system. The time saved is the main advantage of inserting the PPS with the patient in the lateral decubitus position without repositioning. Use of the lateral PPS with a guide wire-less technique may help improve operative efficiency and reduce cost.

Highlights

  • Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and bilateral percutaneous pedicle fixation are valuable, minimally invasive lateral approaches used to treat symptomatic degenerative disc disease

  • Of the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) are techniques used for indirect decompression of the neural structures through interbody distraction and fusion in the lumbar

  • Some groups have described a technique in which the percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) are placed while the patient remains in the lateral position following the LLIF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and bilateral percutaneous pedicle fixation are valuable, minimally invasive lateral approaches used to treat symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Concomitant posterior fixation is often recommended because of the higher rates of nonunion after the LLIF procedure In this case, the use of bilateral percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) is considered to be the gold standard [5]. After the lateral access surgery, the patient is repositioned in the prone position for the pedicle screw fixation. This repositioning requires completing a second round of preparation, draping, and Hiyama et al Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2019) 14:304 room positioning, which increases the operation time and cost because of the extra use of materials. Few institutions have installed these instruments because of the cost

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call