Abstract

This research was about Marxism in Jack the Giant Slayer on social class and kind of Marxism. Marxism was an important thing in the society because Marxism wanted to remove social classes. Thus, this research was to describe how social classes could influence someone’s roles in the society. This research used descriptive qualitative method. The research was conducted by accommodating two theories: kinds of Marxism by Tyson (2006) and social class by Barry (2002). Tyson’s theory (2006) classifies Marxism into classism, patriotism, religion, rugged individualism, and consumerism. On the other hand, Barry’s theory (2002) classifies social class into the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class. The findings of the analysis reveal that there were ten data in Jack the Giant Slayer. The researcher found ten forms of Marxism, There were one form of classism, twelve forms of rugged individualism, and one form of consumerism. The most of kind dominant Marxism was classism. Besides, the researcher found three forms of social class, they were the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class. There were four characters of the upper class, one character of the middle class, and two characters of the lower class. The dominant social class was the upper class, which appeared in four characters.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAccording to Milios, Dimoulis and Economakis (2002:03), Marx developed his economic theory, under the rubric of A Critique of Political Economy, mainly in the period 1857-1867

  • Marxism was an ideology created by Karl Marx

  • When analyzing the kinds of Marxism, the researcher found four kinds of Marxism from five forms of the kind of Marxism (proposed by Tyson (2006)). These four forms are divided into ten forms, one form of rugged individualism, five forms of classism and one form of consumerism, and three forms of patriotism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to Milios, Dimoulis and Economakis (2002:03), Marx developed his economic theory, under the rubric of A Critique of Political Economy, mainly in the period 1857-1867. It was a well-defined system, structured as a logical array of original concepts and analyses based on Marx’s notions of value and surplus-value. The Marxist doctrine was omnipotent because it was true. It was comprehensive and harmonious, and provides men with an integral world outlook irreconcilable with any form of superstition, reaction, or defense of bourgeois oppression

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call