Abstract
The use of item-ability regressions (the comparison of the regression of the observed proportion of people answering an item correctly on estimated θ with the estimated item response function) to investigate the psychometric properties of particular item types in a given population was explored using data from four administrations of 10 item types (a total of 806 items) from the Graduate Record Examinations General Test. Although the method does not allow an absolute deter mination of fit for a latent trait model (in this case, for the three-parameter logistic model), it does show that certain item types consistently fit the model worse than other item types, and it led to and supported a specific hypothesis as to why the model probably did not fit these item types.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
