Abstract

People tend to display fake expressions to conceal their true feelings. False expressions are observable by facial micromovements that occur for less than a second. Systems designed to recognize facial expressions (e.g., social robots, recognition systems for the blind, monitoring systems for drivers) may better understand the user’s intent by identifying the authenticity of the expression. The present study investigated the characteristics of real and fake facial expressions of representative emotions (happiness, contentment, anger, and sadness) in a two-dimensional emotion model. Participants viewed a series of visual stimuli designed to induce real or fake emotions and were signaled to produce a facial expression at a set time. From the participant’s expression data, feature variables (i.e., the degree and variance of movement, and vibration level) involving the facial micromovements at the onset of the expression were analyzed. The results indicated significant differences in the feature variables between the real and fake expression conditions. The differences varied according to facial regions as a function of emotions. This study provides appraisal criteria for identifying the authenticity of facial expressions that are applicable to future research and the design of emotion recognition systems.

Highlights

  • Humans utilize both verbal and nonverbal communication channels

  • The present study compared the differences in the micromovement of facial expressions between real and fake emotions

  • The feature variables obtained at 4 s, 1 s, and 0.5 s after the onset (t) of facial expression were analyzed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans utilize both verbal and nonverbal communication channels. The latter category includes facial expressions, gestures, posture, gait, gaze, distance, and tone and manner of voice [1]. Facial expressions project the communicator’s intentions and emotions [3]. People may conceal their true feelings and produce fake expressions [4]. Such false expressions are exhibited for a very short time with only subtle changes [5], and it is extremely difficult to detect their authenticity with eyesight [6]. Identifying fake expressions is paramount to counter deception and recognize users’ true intent in advanced intelligent systems (e.g., social robots and assistive systems)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call