Abstract

There is a global trend of an increased interest in plant-based diets. This includes an increase in the consumption of plant-based proteins at the expense of animal-based proteins. Plant-derived proteins are now also frequently applied in sports nutrition. So far, we have learned that the ingestion of plant-derived proteins, such as soy and wheat protein, result in lower post-prandial muscle protein synthesis responses when compared with the ingestion of an equivalent amount of animal-based protein. The lesser anabolic properties of plant-based versus animal-derived proteins may be attributed to differences in their protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics, as well as to differences in amino acid composition between these protein sources. Most plant-based proteins have a low essential amino acid content and are often deficient in one or more specific amino acids, such as lysine and methionine. However, there are large differences in amino acid composition between various plant-derived proteins or plant-based protein sources. So far, only a few studies have directly compared the muscle protein synthetic response following the ingestion of a plant-derived protein versus a high(er) quality animal-derived protein. The proposed lower anabolic properties of plant- versus animal-derived proteins may be compensated for by (i) consuming a greater amount of the plant-derived protein or plant-based protein source to compensate for the lesser quality; (ii) using specific blends of plant-based proteins to create a more balanced amino acid profile; (iii) fortifying the plant-based protein (source) with the specific free amino acid(s) that is (are) deficient. Clinical studies are warranted to assess the anabolic properties of the various plant-derived proteins and their protein sources in vivo in humans and to identify the factors that may or may not compromise the capacity to stimulate post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates. Such work is needed to determine whether the transition towards a more plant-based diet is accompanied by a transition towards greater dietary protein intake requirements.

Highlights

  • A single exercise session increases muscle protein synthesis rates, and to a lesser extent, muscle protein breakdown rates [1]

  • Ingestion of plant-derived proteins is generally considered to result in lower post-prandial muscle protein synthesis responses when compared with the ingestion of an equivalent amount of animal-derived protein

  • The lesser anabolic properties of plant-based versus animal-derived proteins have been attributed to differences in their protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics and amino acid composition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A single exercise session increases muscle protein synthesis rates, and to a lesser extent, muscle protein breakdown rates [1]. Net muscle protein balance does not become positive unless exogenous amino acids are provided [2]. Dietary protein ingestion increases muscle protein synthesis rates at rest [3–5] and further increases muscle protein synthesis rates during recovery from exercise [2, 6, 7]. Previous work has shown that besides the amount of protein [8–11], the digestion and absorption kinetics [12] and amino acid composition of a protein (source) [13, 14] largely determine the muscle protein synthetic response to feeding.

Key Points
Protein Digestion and Amino Acid Absorption
Amino Acid Composition of Protein
Improving the Anabolic Properties of Plant‐Based Proteins
Post‐Prandial Protein Handling Following Meal Ingestion
Plant‐Based Proteins in Sports Nutrition
Alternative Protein Sources
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call