Abstract

Glutamatergic synapses rely on AMPA receptors (AMPARs) for fast synaptic transmission and plasticity. AMPAR auxiliary proteins regulate receptor trafficking, and modulate receptor mobility and its biophysical properties. The AMPAR auxiliary protein Shisa7 (CKAMP59) has been shown to interact with AMPARs in artificial expression systems, but it is unknown whether Shisa7 has a functional role in glutamatergic synapses. We show that Shisa7 physically interacts with synaptic AMPARs in mouse hippocampus. Shisa7 gene deletion resulted in faster AMPAR currents in CA1 synapses, without affecting its synaptic expression. Shisa7 KO mice showed reduced initiation and maintenance of long-term potentiation of glutamatergic synapses. In line with this, Shisa7 KO mice showed a specific deficit in contextual fear memory, both short-term and long-term after conditioning, whereas auditory fear memory and anxiety-related behavior were normal. Thus, Shisa7 is a bona-fide AMPAR modulatory protein affecting channel kinetics of AMPARs, necessary for synaptic hippocampal plasticity, and memory recall.

Highlights

  • In the adult brain, fast excitatory synaptic transmission is largely mediated by AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs)

  • The function of most of these direct AMPAR interactors is hitherto unknown, several have been identified as AMPAR auxiliary subunits, affecting trafficking, channel kinetics, surface mobility, and activity-dependent

  • We reveal that Shisa7 directly associates with AMPARs within native hippocampal protein complexes, independent of AMPAR subunit composition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fast excitatory synaptic transmission is largely mediated by AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs). Activity-dependent changes in the efficacy of glutamatergic transmission depends on both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms (Fioravante and Regehr, 2011; Castillo, 2012; Huganir and Nicoll, 2013). In the post-synapse this process is mainly determined by regulation of the number and biophysical properties of synaptic AMPARs (Conti and Weinberg, 1999; Jonas, 2000; Carroll et al, 2001; Bredt and Nicoll, 2003; Choquet and Triller, 2003; Shepherd and Huganir, 2007; Choquet, 2010; Fioravante and Regehr, 2011; Castillo, 2012). The function of most of these direct AMPAR interactors is hitherto unknown, several have been identified as AMPAR auxiliary subunits, affecting trafficking, channel kinetics, surface mobility, and activity-dependent

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call