Abstract
On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of Culture & Psychology, the author retrospectively evaluates the journal’s metatheoretical and theoretical developmental trajectories. For this purpose, seven editorials were treated as the primary texts in the foreground as evaluative reflections of the knowledge field themselves. And in the background, the author’s own readership and conceptualizations inevitably provided the additional intellectual material for this brief essay. First, she highlights the journal’s initial aspirations for culture-inclusive psychology scholarship it welcomes, the necessary and (im)possible tasks and the evaluative standards it sets for itself. They are presented as the identity developmental markers and grouped around seven axiomatic themes. Second, the possible sources of “developmental delays,” “deviations” from its valued norms, or for the “unattained” ideals as judged by its own standards, are sorted out in terms of implicit/explicit knowledge positions presupposed within the heterogeneity of the scholarship. Third, the achievements and/or determinate decisions are acknowledged. Lastly, the author critically reflects from within her own perspectivally prospective perspective towards further transformations of contemporary psychology as culture/culture as psychology.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.