The American Empire in the Congo: The Assassination of Patrice Lumumba

Abstract

The American Empire in the Congo: The Assassination of Patrice Lumumba By Nicholas Langer A merican Cold War Imperialism spanned the globe, crossing oceans and continents to enforce the iron will of the United States. Following the Second World War, Africa and Asia were seeking to dislodge the influence of Imperialism. In the case of Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh’s rebels were sadly mistaken in believing that the United States would support their bid for independence from the French. The United States had overthrown the democratically elected president of Guatemala, along with Mohammed Mosadegh in Iran, and had inserted 15,000 advisors in support of the Diem puppet government in Vietnam by the time of the Congo Crisis in the early 1960’s. 1 So, American intervention in the affairs of Third World countries was far from unprecedented by the time that Patrice Lumumba took power in the Congo and sought to extricate the country from the shadow of European colonialism. It is my argument that American involvement in the assassination of Patrice Lumumba followed the pattern of intervention which was well established in Latin America and elsewhere. The Congo Crisis of 1960 represented the beginning of widespread western involvement in the newly independent Congo. In analyzing the Congo crisis we can see the final death throes of Belgian imperialism and the beginning of American involvement in the region, as well as the role that the United Nations would play in decolonization and the Cold War. The orthodox view argues that the United States maintained purely altruistic motives of decolonization and anti- communism in the Congo and that any unrest was the result of factors which the United States was unable to control. The revisionist standpoint argues the opposite: that the United States actively intervened in the Congo and promoted its own interests. These arguments introduce the general narrative of the Congo Crisis and the Cold War ideology of the United States in addition to validating the revisionist line of argument. America in the Congo in Two Accounts: The Orthodox and the Revisionist The article “The United States, Belgium, and the Congo Crisis of 1960,” written by Lawrence Kaplan and published in The Review of Politics in 1967, represents a summation of the orthodox view of American involvement in the Congo Crisis. 2 The article was written well before the Church Committee hearing—a Senate committee which investigated American covert actions during the Cold War and which published their findings in 1975—that would confirm active American involvement in a plot to kill Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba, and thus its arguments relied heavily on the official policy statements and news material that was available at the time. The main objective of Kaplan’s argument seems to be an effort to apologize for American dedication to anti-colonialism to an imagined Belgian audience. In doing so, Kaplan paints American intentions as purely chivalrous and rejects any argument that the United States was acting on ulterior motives. He further washes America’s hands of involvement in the breakdown of authority and places that blame back on the Belgians, who act as a foil to Brandon Wolfe-Hunnicutt, “Vietnamese Decolonization and the Origins of US Involvement 1960” (Lecture, US Foreign Relations, 1945-1991, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, September 26, 2013). Kaplan, Lawrence S. “The United States, Belgium, and the Congo Crisis of 1960,” The Review of Politics, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Apr., 1967), 239-256.