Abstract
ABSTRACT It is widely reported, based on clustering measurements of observed active galactic nucleus (AGN) samples, that AGNs reside in similar mass host dark matter haloes across the bulk of cosmic time, with log $\mathcal {M}/\mathcal {M}_{\odot }\sim 12.5\!-\!13.0$ to z ∼ 2.5. We show that this is due in part to the AGN fraction in galaxies rising with increasing stellar mass, combined with AGN observational selection effects that exacerbate this trend. Here, we use AGN specific accretion rate distribution functions determined as a function of stellar mass and redshift for star-forming and quiescent galaxies separately, combined with the latest galaxy–halo connection models, to determine the parent and subhalo mass distribution function of AGNs to various observational limits. We find that while the median (sub)halo mass of AGNs, $\approx 10^{12}\mathcal {M}_{\odot }$, is fairly constant with luminosity, specific accretion rate, and redshift, the full halo mass distribution function is broad, spanning several orders of magnitude. We show that widely used methods to infer a typical dark matter halo mass based on an observed AGN clustering amplitude can result in biased, systematically high host halo masses. While the AGN satellite fraction rises with increasing parent halo mass, we find that the central galaxy is often not an AGN. Our results elucidate the physical causes for the apparent uniformity of AGN host haloes across cosmic time and underscore the importance of accounting for AGN selection biases when interpreting observational AGN clustering results. We further show that AGN clustering is most easily interpreted in terms of the relative bias to galaxy samples, not from absolute bias measurements alone.
Highlights
Accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs), observed as active galactic nuclei (AGN), are thought to play a crucial role in the galaxy evolution process, influencing the shape of the galaxy stellar mass function (e.g., Bower et al 2012; Puchwein & Springel 2013), the morphologies of galaxies (Dubois et al 2016), and contributing to the quenching of star formation (e.g., Croton et al 2006; Hopkins et al 2006; Zubovas & King 2012; Dubois et al 2013; Beckmann et al 2017)
We show that the inferred host halo mass derived from observed AGN samples should not be interpreted as reflecting the true AGN host halo mass distribution, which can be lower once the known stellar mass-dependent AGN selection effects are accounted for
We show the contribution to the total halo mass function from galaxies with different stellar masses by the colored lines
Summary
Accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs), observed as active galactic nuclei (AGN), are thought to play a crucial role in the galaxy evolution process, influencing the shape of the galaxy stellar mass function (e.g., Bower et al 2012; Puchwein & Springel 2013), the morphologies of galaxies (Dubois et al 2016), and contributing to the quenching of star formation (e.g., Croton et al 2006; Hopkins et al 2006; Zubovas & King 2012; Dubois et al 2013; Beckmann et al 2017). The extreme difference in scale between galaxies and supermassive black holes, coupled with the relative rarity of the active accretion phase of SMBHs, has made it difficult to determine the physical mechanisms connecting galaxy and AGN growth. Constraining the triggering and fueling mechanisms of AGNs is crucial to uncovering the relevant physics behind the impact that SMBHs have on their host galaxies. The spatial distribution or clustering of AGN on large scales is often used to constrain the host dark matter halo properties of AGN and can reveal AGN triggering mechanisms when compared to theoretical models (e.g., Allevato et al 2011; Gatti et al 2016). Clustering measurements allow AGN to be placed in a cosmological context and reveal underlying correlations between the large-scale structure of the Universe and AGN fueling
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.