Abstract
The Internet is built on a powerful idea — treating all packets the same whether they are voice packets or text or whatever. These packets are all the same and are inherently neutral because they have been decoupled from their meaning. The debate over network neutrality is framed in terms of common carriage. The assumption is that packets are freight with inherent meaning and that neutrality only applies to packets that happen to be part of a separate Internet. The idea that bits do not have inherent meaning is about far more than just networking. It is a basic engineering principle and a philosophical principle that goes against our basic way of conceptualizing the world. It is argued that recognize that today’s telecommunications policies are framed in the failed idea that we need an intelligent network to transport meaning. The meaning (and intelligence) is in our devices. We need to take an infrastructure-based approach rather than purposely limiting our ability to communicate, limiting our ability to access education and health care, and limiting our ability to innovate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.