Abstract
This article uses the toolbox of histoire croisee to study Anglo-French interaction in Ford Madox Ford's English Review and Transatlantic Review and T. S. Eliot's Criterion. It argues that histoire croisee allows for a more nuanced sense of processes of internationalization than Pierre Bourdieu's nationally inspired field theory and accounts for the selected magazines' varying degrees of success by combining both methodological perspectives. While Eliot's Criterion, despite its European ambitions, catered for a predominantly British audience, Ford's Transatlantic Review lacked a well-defined national readership, thus failing to acquire symbolic (and therefore economic) capital in Paris, London, and New York.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
