Abstract

The functional decline in action among older adults is caused not only by physical weakness but also by cognitive decline. In this study, we aimed to compare the cognitive effects of age between intention-based and stimulus-based action modes electrophysiologically. Because age-related declines in cognitive function might proceed distinctly according to specific action modes and processes, four specific cognitive processes, action-effect binding, stimulus-response linkage, action-effect feedback control, and effect-action retrieval, were investigated. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during a modified acquisition-test paradigm in young (mean age = 21, SD = 2) and old (mean age = 69, SD = 5) groups. A temporal bisection task and a movement pre-cuing task were used during the acquisition and test phases, respectively. Using ERP indices including readiness potential (RP), P3, N2 and contingent negative variation (CNV) to identify these four specific processes for the two action modes, we revealed the effects of age on each ERP index. The results showed similar patterns of waveforms but consistently decreasing amplitudes of all four ERP indices in the old age group compared with the young age group, which indicates not only generally declining functions of action preparation in older adults but also age effects specific to the action modes and processes that might otherwise be mixed together under confounding experimental conditions. Particularly, an interference effect indexed by the differences in the amplitudes of CNV between congruent and incongruent tasks was observed in the young age group, which is consistent with previous behavioral reports. However, this effect was absent in the old age group, indicating a specific age-related deficit in the effect-action retrieval process of intention-based action, which might be caused by an age-related deficit in associative memory. In sum, this study investigated the cognitive processes of two action modes from a developmental perspective and suggests the importance of adding associative memory training to interventions for older adults with the aim of improving intention-based action.

Highlights

  • The functional decline in action among older adults is caused by physical weakness and by cognitive decline

  • The results showed that the interference effect of reaction time (RT), that is, faster performance on the congruent task compared with incongruent task, was only observed in intention-based action

  • We observed a decrease in event-related potentials (ERPs) amplitudes in the old age group with similar pattern as in the young age group during most specific processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The functional decline in action among older adults is caused by physical weakness and by cognitive decline. The effects of healthy aging on cognitive processes of action are not well understood (Onofrj et al, 2001 for a review; Sterr and Dean, 2008; Reuter et al, 2015). Age-related declines in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and executive function have been implicated in changes in both the motor preparation and execution phases (Sterr and Dean, 2008; Berchicci et al, 2012; Woods et al, 2015). The possible underlying mechanism involves the compensatory mechanism, overactivation of specific brain areas, and dedifferentiation (see Reuter-Lorenz, 2002 for a review). According to the frontal lobe hypothesis (West, 1996, 2000) and reverse theory (Braak et al, 1999), age-related declines in brain areas might proceed distinctly. It is necessary to compare the age effect between different action modes under specific cognitive processes to further understand the effects of age on motor cognition

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.