Abstract
A decade after Édouard Glissant’s passing, how have his self-proclaimed intellectual heirs and scholars of his work placed this work in the contemporary Western, francophone, Caribbean, or global theoretical landscape? What role does his historical and biographical contextualization, such as describing the thinker as Martinican, Black, or francophone play in shaping his legacy? What are the unacknowledged hierarchies and ideological assumptions that shape these different interpretations of the same body of work? How do notions of influence, filiation, and debt affect the reception and the world-making potentialities of key concepts such as ‘Tout-monde’, ‘chaos-monde’, or ‘Relation’?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
