The advantage of cone-beam computerized tomography over panoramic radiography and temporomandibular joint quadruple radiography in assessing temporomandibular joint osseous degenerative changes

Abstract

Background/purposeThe clinical diagnosis of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) degenerative joint disease (DJD) is based primarily on radiographic features of the condyle and articular eminence. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of using plain radiography to that of cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) in identifying different types of osseous degenerative features in the TMJ condyle. Materials and methodsThe panoramic radiography (PANO), TMJ quadruple radiography (TMJQR) and CBCT images of 29 patients’ TMJs were retrieved from a computer database and independently evaluated by a young oral surgeon and a senior TMD specialist. The examiners diagnosed osseous degenerative features on the radiographic images. The radiologist-assisted CBCT diagnoses were used as a reference standard and the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of using the three radiographic modalities were statistically analyzed. ResultsThere were cases of indeterminate diagnoses using the PANO and TMJQR due to superimposition from surrounding structures, but none using CBCT. Reliability was generally poor when using PANO and TMJQR for detecting osseous degenerative features of the TMJ condyle but good to excellent when using CBCT. The sensitivity and specificity in the use of PANO and TMJQR were typically below acceptable, but the levels were generally satisfactory when using CBCT. ConclusionCBCT is superior to plain radiographic modalities for diagnosing osseous degenerative features of TMJs with regard to indeterminate cases, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. It is recommended that CBCT can be used as an effective tool in identifying TMJ osteoarthritis.