Abstract
Admissibility of criminal convictions as evidence in criminal proceedings has become a controversial decision of the Court of Appeal of United Kingdom in the case of Hollington v Hewthorn (1943). Since then several follow-up decisions has either adopted this decision and some jurisdictions have rejected it. This article assesses the effect of this decision in four jurisdictions, i.e UK, Australia, Canada and Malaysia. It is found that UK, Australia and Canada have since moved away from this judgement by amendment to their respective Evidence Acts. However, this is not so in the case of Malaysia. This paper recommends that Malaysia revisit section 43 of the Evidence Act 1950 with a view to amend this section to be on par with UK, Australia and Canada.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
