Abstract
The paper examines the administrative and judicial review of the ECB decisions in the banking supervisory field. In the first part the core characteristics of the functioning of the internal administrative review carried out by the Administrative Board of Review (ABoR) are described, and the paper highlights the differences between the ABoR and similar bodies that are already in place for reviewing decisions of some European agencies. In the second part the paper explores the specific features of the judicial review of ECB decisions in this field.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.