Abstract

This is the second article in a series of two that discusses whether historians are within their professional rights to investigate miracle claims. In the first, I made a positive case that they are and then proceeded to examine two major arguments in support of a negative verdict to the issue: the principle of analogy and antecedent probability. I argued that neither should deter historians from issuing a positive verdict on miracle claims when certain criteria are met and the event is the best explanation of the relevant historical bedrock. In this second article, I examine three additional objections commonly appealed to by biblical scholars: the theological objection, lack of consensus and miracle claims in multiple religions. The resurrection of Jesus is occasionally cited as an example.

Highlights

  • Original ResearchAffiliations: 1Department of New Testament Studies, University of Pretoria, South Africa

  • The question as to whether historians are within their professional rights when adjudicating on the historicity of miracle claims is a discussion taking place even outside of the community of biblical scholars (Licona 2009)

  • I made a positive case that historians are within their professional rights to adjudicate on the historicity of miracle claims

Read more

Summary

Original Research

Affiliations: 1Department of New Testament Studies, University of Pretoria, South Africa. How to cite this article: Licona, M.R. & Van der Watt, J.G., 2009, ‘The adjudication of miracles: Rethinking the criteria of historicity’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 65(1), Art. Note: This article is a reworked version of Dr Michael R. Licona’s (Alpharetta, GA, USA), PhD thesis in New Testament Studies, titled ‘The historicity of the resurrection of Jesus: Historiographical considerations in the light of recent debates’, submitted to and accepted by the Faculty of Theology at the University of Pretoria, under supervision of Prof.

INTRODUCTION
THEOLOGICAL OBJECTIONS
LACK OF CONSENSUS
MIRACLE CLAIMS IN MULTIPLE RELIGIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.