Abstract

Cytoplasmic lipid droplets (CLD) in mammary epithelial cells undergo secretion by a unique membrane envelopment process to produce milk lipids. Adipophilin (ADPH/Plin2), a member of the perilipin/PAT family of lipid droplet-associated proteins, is hypothesized to mediate CLD secretion through interactions with apical plasma membrane elements. We found that the secretion of CLD coated by truncated ADPH lacking the C-terminal region encoding a putative four-helix bundle structure was impaired relative to that of CLD coated by full-length ADPH. We used homology modeling and analyses of the solution and membrane binding properties of purified recombinant ADPH C terminus to understand how this region possibly mediates CLD secretion. Homology modeling supports the concept that the ADPH C terminus forms a four-helix bundle motif and suggests that this structure can form stable membrane bilayer interactions. Circular dichroism and protease mapping studies confirmed that the ADPH C terminus is an independently folding α-helical structure that is relatively resistant to urea denaturation. Liposome binding studies showed that the purified C terminus binds to phospholipid membranes through electrostatic dependent interactions, and cell culture studies documented that it localizes to the plasma membrane. Collectively, these data provide direct evidence that the ADPH C terminus forms a stable membrane binding helical structure that is important for CLD secretion. We speculate that interactions between the four-helix bundle of ADPH and membrane phospholipids may be an initial step in milk lipid secretion.

Highlights

  • Adenoviral Expression of GFP-ADPH[1–220] in Mammary Epithelial Cells—Initial structure-function studies indicating that cytoplasmic lipid droplets (CLD) binding and stabilization functions of ADPH are located within its N-terminal half (Fig. 1A) [15,16,17] have led to speculation that the C-terminal portion of ADPH may contribute to CLD secretion by mediating interactions with elements of the plasma membrane [11]

  • Immunofluorescence and tomographic analyses of immunogold-stained cells stably expressing GFP-ADPH(fl)-VSV or GFP-ADPH[1–220]-VSV (Fig. 1B) demonstrate that these constructs correctly localize to the CLD surface and verify that the C-terminal region is not required for the CLD binding function of ADPH [15, 17]

  • We tested the importance of the ADPH C-terminal region in CLD secretion by determining the relative abilities of CLD coated with GFP-ADPH(fl)-VSV or GFP-ADPH[1–220]

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Antibodies—Rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific to the C-terminal 15 amino acids (anti-ADPHcterm) or the N-terminal 25 amino acids (anti-ADPHnterm) of mouse ADPH were generated as described previously [19]. CLD Quantitation—Average CLD diameters were determined by analysis of individual CLD coated with GFPADPH(fl)-VSV, GFP-ADPH[1–220]-VSV, or endogenous ADPH in immunostained sections containing 60 – 80 randomly chosen alveoli at ϫ600 magnification as described previously [8]. Purified GST-ADPH[172– 425] was collected, rebound to glutathione-Sepharose, and digested with 50 units of thrombin (Sigma-Aldrich) to remove the GST tag. The purity of eluted protein was determined by SDS-PAGE and silver staining and immunoblot analysis using anti-ADPHcterm antibodies [19]. ADPH-bound liposomes were collected by centrifugation at 16,000 ϫ g for 15 min, resuspended in 100 ␮l of buffer, and analyzed by anti-ADPHcterm immunoblotting following SDS-PAGE. The optimal interaction of ADPH[172–425] with the membrane corresponded to the orientation with the minimum solvation energy

RESULTS
Residues residues helix helix Net charge
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call