Abstract

Pupillometry has received increased interest for its usefulness in measuring various sensory processes as an alternative to behavioural assessments. This is also apparent for multisensory investigations. Studies of the multisensory pupil response, however, have produced conflicting results. Some studies observed super-additive multisensory pupil responses, indicative of multisensory integration (MSI). Others observed additive multisensory pupil responses even though reaction time (RT) measures were indicative of MSI. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the nature of the multisensory pupil response by combining methodological approaches of previous studies while using supra-threshold stimuli only. In two experiments we presented auditory and visual stimuli to observers that evoked a(n) (onset) response (be it constriction or dilation) in a simple detection task and a change detection task. In both experiments, the RT data indicated MSI as shown by race model inequality violation. Still, the multisensory pupil response in both experiments could best be explained by linear summation of the unisensory pupil responses. We conclude that the multisensory pupil response for supra-threshold stimuli is additive in nature and cannot be used as a measure of MSI, as only a departure from additivity can unequivocally demonstrate an interaction between the senses.

Highlights

  • Pupillometry has received increased interest for its usefulness in measuring various sensory processes as an alternative to behavioural assessments

  • The proportion of hits was very high in all conditions

  • In this first Experiment, the response time analysis in the response block suggests that multisensory integration (MSI) had occurred with these stimuli as shown by significant RMI violation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pupillometry has received increased interest for its usefulness in measuring various sensory processes as an alternative to behavioural assessments. Some studies observed super-additive multisensory pupil responses, indicative of multisensory integration (MSI). In two experiments we presented auditory and visual stimuli to observers that evoked a(n) (onset) response (be it constriction or dilation) in a simple detection task and a change detection task. In both experiments, the RT data indicated MSI as shown by race model inequality violation. A central question in many multisensory studies, which is no different in the case of the multisensory pupil response, is whether the observed multisensory behaviour is different from response to unisensory stimuli (e.g. sound or light alone).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call