Abstract

Tender-based public procurement could be a useful tool to promote compliance with human rights and labour law obligations in the execution of public contracts. However, at the same time, the instrument itself is likely to negatively affect contracting authorities’ decisions to effectively use this potential, especially during the execution phase. This paper assesses the impact of several general characteristics of tender-based public procurement in light of the promotion of human rights compliance. Could this objective for example benefit from the inherent competitive setting of a tendering procedure, the fundamental principles of public procurement and the resulting doctrine of substantial change? Does tender-based public procurement comprise any inherent barriers when using this as an instrument to promote human rights compliance? By answering these questions, the paper aims to provide a realistic perspective on the potential of tender-based public procurement as an instrument to promote human rights compliance and the barriers that should be taken into account in this regard. This could be a sensible starting point for any regulatory measures aiming to further facilitate the promotion of human rights compliance through public procurement.

Highlights

  • Introduction and approachConsumerism may be one of the greatest influencing powers of our time

  • What conclusions may be drawn regarding the potential added value of tender-based public procurement when it comes to the promotion of HR compliance, based on the inherent characteristics of this instrument?

  • I argued that the instrument does provide a unique incentive in this regard, because the CA’s discretion not to enforce its requirements is restricted by the regulatory framework, which can be enforced by the competitors of the non-complying tenderer

Read more

Summary

Introduction and approach

Consumerism may be one of the greatest influencing powers of our time. The choices we make as consumers have great and diverse impact, often far out of sight because of globalized trade. The questions of whether public procurement – tender-based public procurement in particular4 – should be used as a means to promote human rights compliance and if so, what (regulatory) measures should be taken to facilitate this, will not be answered in this paper. This paper will focus on the first level, seeking to answer the question to what extent the inherent characteristics of tender-based public procurement may be expected to have an effect on its potential as an instrument to promote HR compliance. I believe that a clear picture of what should be expected of the instrument itself in light of the objective of HR compliance, will provide a sensible starting point for any subsequent decisions (at the second and third level) regarding potential (regulatory) measures aiming to optimize the potential impact of the instrument in this regard. Utrecht Law Review | Volume 14 | Issue 2, 2018 | Special Issue: Accountability of Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Abuses

Limited regulatory scope
Direct competition
Primary objective for the contracting authority
Relevant stakeholders
Enforcement
Introduction
First dimension
Second dimension
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call