Abstract

An unpredictable stimulus elicits a stronger event-related response than a high-probability stimulus. This differential in response magnitude is termed the mismatch negativity (MMN). Over the past decade, it has become increasingly popular to explain the MMN terms of predictive coding, a proposed general principle for the way the brain realizes Bayesian inference when it interprets sensory information. This perspective article is a reminder that the issue of MMN generation is far from settled, and that an alternative model in terms of adaptation continues to lurk in the wings. The adaptation model has been discounted because of the unrealistic and simplistic fashion in which it tends to be set up. Here, simulations of auditory cortex incorporating a modern version of the adaptation model are presented. These show that locally operating short-term synaptic depression accounts both for adaptation due to stimulus repetition and for MMN responses. This happens even in cases where adaptation has been ruled out as an explanation of the MMN (e.g., in the stimulus omission paradigm and the multi-standard control paradigm). Simulation models that would demonstrate the viability of predictive coding in a similarly multifaceted way are currently missing from the literature, and the reason for this is discussed in light of the current results.

Highlights

  • Change detection in the brain is studied by using the oddball paradigm where sporadically presented deviant stimuli are mixed in among often-repeating standard stimuli

  • The rise of predictive coding (PC) as an explanation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) has been heralded by a number of studies which point to evidence in favour of PC and against the adaptation model (e.g., Wacongne et al, 2012; Lieder et al, 2013a; Fitzgerald and Todd, 2020). We revisit this issue and consider the viability of PC obliquely: I present the modern version of the adaptation model and a variety of simulations which produce MMN responses, including some that might pose a challenge for PC

  • There is nothing low-level about adaptation: while it is detected by using stimulus repetition – the simplest and the most boring of stimulation paradigms – it reflects a fundamental mechanism whereby the auditory cortex is able to keep track of the past in a way which informs the way it responds to the present

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Change detection in the brain is studied by using the oddball paradigm where sporadically presented deviant stimuli are mixed in among often-repeating standard stimuli. We revisit this issue and consider the viability of PC obliquely: I present the modern version of the adaptation model and a variety of simulations which produce MMN responses, including some that might pose a challenge for PC.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.