The adaptation and sealing ability of light‐cured glass ionomer retrograde root fillings

Abstract

The adaptation and sealing ability of a light-cured glass ionomer cement when used as a retrograde root filling was assessed using a confocal optical microscope with and without a fluorescent dye. This material was compared with a conventional glass ionomer cement and amalgam. The root canals of 60 extracted human single-rooted teeth were prepared and filled with gutta-percha and sealer. All the teeth were apicected, retrograde cavities were prepared, and then divided into three groups of 20 teeth each and filled with the test materials. The light-cured glass ionomer cement was well adapted to the retrograde cavity and apicected root surface. Within the retrograde cavity the cement was often well adapted to one wall, but gaps were found on the opposite cavity wall. This was probably caused by the polymerization contraction of the material. In contrast, the amalgam retrograde root fillings were poorly adapted to the cavities, with gaps between the cavity walls and amalgam. This group exhibited the poorest sealing ability as measured by the extent of dye penetration. The conventional glass ionomer cement was often found smeared over the root face, and there were unfilled voids at the base of some retrograde cavities. The results of the dye leakage study were analysed statistically. The sealing ability of the light-cured glass ionomer cement was significantly better than that of amalgam (P less than 0.001). The dye penetration around the light-cured glass ionomer cement and the conventional glass ionomer cement was not significantly different (P greater than 0.05). However, the sealing ability of the conventional glass ionomer cement was significantly better than that of amalgam (P less than 0.05).