Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Proclus’ notion of divine descent, i.e., κατάβασις, on the formation of core theological doctrines in Pseudo-Dionysius and Maximus the Confessor. The notion of κατάβασις was originally employed by pagan Proclus to explain the downward providence of gods toward humans, emphasizing the dominant role of gods for human perfection. In his exegesis on Alcibiades I, Proclus identified Socrates as the incarnation of divine providence, a divinely inspired lover in charge of Alcibiades’ conversion to philosophical life. Pseudo-Dionysius adapted the Proclean notion of κατάβασις by supplementing it with the Christian notion of God’s ecstatic love, understood as God’s providential act toward His creation. In the Celestial Hierarchy and Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, Dionysius endeavored to reveal the reciprocal-ecstatic union between God and humans made possible by His ecstatic κατάβασις during the liturgy. Maximus adapted and further developed the Dionysian notion of κατάβασις. While stressing the crucial role of the κατάβασις for human salvation, he gave it a new meaning by synthesizing it in the context of his anthropology, which stressed the holistic transformation of the human body and soul as a result of the divine descent.

Highlights

  • Dionysius Areopagite and ooff MthaexpimrouvsidtehnetiCalolnofveessoofr,ggotwdsoffsooerrmhhiuunmmalaanfnigppueerrreffeseccwttiioohnno.11hFaovreProclus, human salvation is shaped a number of Chrisntioatnsodloeclytridneepsenbdyensyt sutpemonattihcealhlyumdraanwaicntgofoἀnνναNάβeβαoασpσιlιaςςt22obbnuuict rraatthher uuppon tthhee κκαατταάββαασιςς concepts

  • 4.0I,/)w. here he identifies two reaqcueinrtermaletnhtesmfeorinhhuims pahnilpoesorfpehcitcioanl d, itshcautssisio, nthoef hreuamdainnefsuslfiolflment, a theme systematically humans and the providence of gods,3 Proclus cast human effort as a mere preparatory step compared to divine providence which practically perfects the readied humans

  • All the divine provides for the secondary beings and transcends th Πᾶν τὸ ΠθεᾶῖονντὸκαθὶεπῖορνονκοαεὶῖπτρῶοννοδεῖυτέῶρνWωδνhεeυκreταέὶbρoἐωξthνῄρtκhηαeτὶαupἐnιrξoiτoῄvῶnρidνηaeτnπdαdριbοtτhyνῶe;ονοsneυeπpμitρaέhοrνeaνωrtοiνoοthn,υeμoέfpνbrωoeivνni,gdsenexceista, bthaeterse tihtse lpouvreereavnedalusn(iittsaerlyf) suprem μήτε τῆςμπήτρεοντοῆίςαπςρχοανλοώίασςηχςατλὴών σaἄηsμςtιhκτeτὴοmννiἄdαμdὐιlτκeοτ;ῦοbνeκcαaὶὐuἑτsνοeιῦp(αtaκhίrααeaνbὶlolἑὑevνπueιεα)nρίiαοstyχνthὴdὑeνeπsbμεtirρnήoοdτyχεesὴriνotsfμpdήriτovεvididedenbceei.n14gs and the uniter of beingsτῆς χωριτσῆτςῆχςωἑρνιώσστῆεως ςἑντώὴνσεπωρςόντὴοιναπνρἀόφναοιναιζνοἀύφσαηςν.ιζούσηIςn. the commentary, divine providence was described in the form of

Read more

Summary

Introduction

WNitheroegparldattoojnuriissmdic,tiohniasl cwlaiomrskinbecame hugely influential among Christian thinkers. My puabrlitsihceldemeaxpps alondreinssttithuteioinmal paffialc- t o2f .PTrohceluNso’ tκiαonτάoβfαΚKσααιςττ,άαwββhααiσcσhιιςςhieinnaPPprrpoorccellcuuisasted as the means of iaotiounrs. Most profound experience oAf mthoendgivthineee,xoegnethese ocfotrheetPhleaotolongiiccdaliaildoegausesofPrPosceluudsoe-xplicitly emphasized the role. Dionysius Areopagite and ooff MthaexpimrouvsidtehnetiCalolnofveessoofr,ggotwdsoffsooerrmhhiuunmmalaanfnigppueerrreffeseccwttiioohnno.11hFaovreProclus, human salvation is shaped a number of Chrisntioatnsodloeclytridneepsenbdyensyt sutpemonattihcealhlyumdraanwaicntgofoἀnνναNάβeβαoασpσιlιaςςt22obbnuuict rraatthher uuppon tthhee κκαατταάββαασιςς concepts. Of the gods which guides them to perfection. ΣιhςuinmPanroscalunsd the providence of gods, Prrocluuss cast human effort as a mere preparatory Li2ce.nTsehe eMNDPoIt, iBoanselo, fSΚwiαtzeτrάlanβdα. σιhςuinmPanroscalunsd the providence of gods, Prrocluuss cast human effort as a mere preparatory

This article is an open access article
Kyeongyoon Woo
See See diviSneee
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call