The acute effects of lower limb blood flow restriction on physiology and performance of competitive cyclists

Abstract

Background: Training in conjunction with limb Blood flow restriction (BFR) is an increasingly popular method of producing increased physiological stress without the strain of high exercise loads. However little is known about the physiological responses to BFR with trained cyclists or how best to prescribe appropriate BFR training intensities. Purpose: In this study, we investigate the acute responses to different levels of BFR with trained cyclists to enable identification of specific training intensity criteria. Methods: Nine trained male cyclist (age 39.2 ± 8.1 years, height 179.1 ± 6.7 cm, weight 75.4 ± 6.7 kg, Max VO 2 4.4 ± 0.5 L.min -1 ) completed a series of tests under conditions of no BFR (N-BFR; 0mmHg), moderate BFR (M-BFR; ~40mmHg) or high BFR (H-BFR; ~80mmHg). During BFR trials restriction was applied to the proximal thighs using 11cm wide pneumatic cuffs. Testing consisted of an incremental maximal cycle test and a self-paced 3-km time-trial. Measurement of Oxygen uptake (VO 2 ), Muscle Oxygen saturation (MO 2 ) blood lactate concentration (Bla) and perceived exertion (RPE) were taken during the incremental test along with performance data from the time trial.  Physiological responses from the three trials were examined across a range of comparable power outputs and at pre-determined blood lactate concentrations of 2 and 4 Mmol. Results: At comparable power outputs, heart rate and RPE was significantly higher (p>0.05) in the H-BFR condition compared to all other conditions. However, there were no significant differences between conditions in VO 2 and MO 2 at equivalent powers. Compared to the N-BFR condition power output was lower by ~9% and ~21 % in the M-BFR and H-BFR condition respectively (fig 1) for fixed blood lactate concentration of 2 and 4mMol. Discussion: Using moderate and high levels of BFR during cycling exercise leads to substantial reductions (left shift) in power output at fixed blood lactate values. The reduced power was associated with increases in heart rate and RPE, at equivalent power outputs. However, measures of O 2 and MO 2 were not significantly different at comparable exercise intensities between the conditions. Conclusions: the decrease in attainable power output in BFR conditions appears predominately due to an increased reliance on anaerobic metabolism and an elevation in blood lactate concentration. Cardiovascular O2 delivery and extraction does not appear to be significantly affected by BFR. Â