Abstract

It is widely agreed that Beckett's writing radically destabilizes the enunciation of linguistic subjectivity through the problematic status of the pronoun 'I' in his work. This is often read as an implicit critique of the 'author-function.' In this paper I examine four different formulations of the enunciative relation between author and text – by Beckett himself, Maurice Blanchot, Michel Foucault, and Giorgio Agamben – and argue that Beckett's impossible "obligation to express" corresponds most closely to the theory of testimony outlined by Agamben, in which the shame experienced through an incapacity to speak responds to a post-war historical crisis of enunciation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.