Abstract

Foam rolling (FR) durations totaling ≤60 s per muscle are reported to acutely increase flexibility and vertical jump performance. However, limited research has investigated whether these benefits can outlast the inactive post-warmup preparatory period that typically separates warmups from the start of sporting competition. Eleven male athletes (height 1.77 0.09 m, body mass 78.0 17.0 kg, age 22 2 years) completed familiarization, followed by three experimental trials in a randomized and counterbalanced repeated measures crossover design. Trials commenced with 5 min jogging, before ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ADF-ROM), sit and reach (S&R), countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) baseline testing. Participants then sat inactively for 10 min (control) or performed lower extremity FR totaling either 30 (30FR) or 60 s (60FR) that targeted four agonist-antagonist leg muscles. Testing was then repeated before and after a simulated inactive 15 min post-warmup preparatory period to establish the acute and delayed effects of FR on performance. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to identify any significant interaction effects between conditions (30FR, 60FR, control) and timepoint (baseline, acute, delayed). No significant condition x timepoint interaction effect was detected for the ADF-ROM (f = 1.63, p = 0.19), S&R (f = 0.80, p = 0.54), CMJ ((f = 0.83, p = 0.99) or SJ (f = 0.66, p = 0.99). Therefore, FR totaling ≤60 s appears insufficient to enhance flexibility or vertical jump performance in male athletes.

Highlights

  • Foam rolling (FR) applies external compression onto the fascia that surround musculotendinous units 1. This external compression has been shown to alter muscle and tendon compliance, with superior joint flexibility 2–6 and performance across vertical jump, linear speed, and multidirectional agility testing reported in some studies following FR 7,8, but not always in others . 9–12 These potential benefits suggest that FR could complement sporting warmups, but little consensus exists on the minimal FR duration necessary to elicit any potential benefits 13

  • No significant FR condition x timepoint interaction effect was detected for the ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ADF-ROM) distance (f = 1.63, p = 0.19), sit and reach (S&R) distance (f = 0.80, p = 0.54), countermovement jump (CMJ) height (f = 0.83, p = 0.99), or squat jump (SJ) height (f = 0.66, p = 0.99; figure 2)

  • There was no FR condition effect measured across all timepoints for either the ADF-ROM distance (f = 2.00, p = 0.16), S&R distance (f = 0.01, p = 0.99), CMJ height (f = 0.22, p = 0.80), or SJ height (f = 1.05, p = 0.37; figure 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Foam rolling (FR) applies external compression onto the fascia that surround musculotendinous units 1 This external compression has been shown to alter muscle and tendon compliance, with superior joint flexibility 2–6 and performance across vertical jump, linear speed, and multidirectional agility testing reported in some studies following FR 7,8, but not always in others . The ecological validity of spending ≥90 s per muscle group in a time constrained warmup remains questionable It is less known whether the same acute benefits can be elicited with FR durations totaling

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call