Abstract

There is growing experimental evidence that the engagement of different brain areas in a given motor task may change with practice, although the specific brain activity patterns underlying different stages of learning, as defined by kinematic or dynamic performance indices, are not well understood. Here we studied the change in activation in motor areas during practice on sequences of handwriting-like trajectories, connecting four target points on a digitizing table “as rapidly and as accurately as possible” while lying inside an fMRI scanner. Analysis of the subjects' pooled kinematic and imaging data, acquired at the beginning, middle, and end of the training period, revealed no correlation between the amount of activation in the contralateral M1, PM (dorsal and ventral), supplementary motor area (SMA), preSMA, and Posterior Parietal Cortex (PPC) and the amount of practice per-se. Single trial analysis has revealed that the correlation between the amount of activation in the contralateral M1 and trial mean velocity was partially modulated by performance gains related effects, such as increased hand motion smoothness. Furthermore, it was found that the amount of activation in the contralateral preSMA increased when subjects shifted from generating straight point-to-point trajectories to their spatiotemporal concatenation into a smooth, curved trajectory. Altogether, our results indicate that the amount of activation in the contralateral M1, PMd, and preSMA during the learning of movement sequences is correlated with performance gains and that high level motion features (e.g., motion smoothness) may modulate, or even mask correlations between activity changes and low-level motion attributes (e.g., trial mean velocity).

Highlights

  • Numerous electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies have attempted to examine the role that different cortical and subcortical motor areas subserve in the planning and execution of planar hand movements

  • We previously showed that extensive training on a sequence of planar hand trajectories passing through several targets resulted in the co-articulation of movement components and in the formation of new movement elements (Sosnik et al, 2004, 2007)

  • CO-ARTICULATION FOR ADJACENT MOTION ELEMENTS IS ACCOMPANIED BY HIGHER MEAN VELOCITY AND LOWER MOTION DURATION Two subjects who practiced target configurations I co-articulated by the end of the last training session in the SEQ and REV conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies have attempted to examine the role that different cortical and subcortical motor areas subserve in the planning and execution of planar hand movements. While some works have reported an increase in the magnitude or extent of activation in particular brain areas as an effect of practice, possibly due to increased neural recruitment (Grafton et al, 1995; Karni et al, 1995; Ungerleider et al, 2002; Penhune and Doyon, 2005; Duff et al, 2007), others have reported no change or a decrease in the activation in these brain areas with increased amount of practice, possibly due to the development of Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call