Abstract
The advanced clinical practitioner (ACP) role has been somewhat controversial since its initial inception, with a delightful array of fairly derogatory opinions aired and nicknames used, my personal favourite being ‘noctor’ — not a doctor. I entirely understand how and why this has happened. GPs spend a decade training to do an incredibly complex job, and many of them also have to be able to run a business with dwindling financial support and ever more hoops to jump through to get whatever money is available, while frequently feeling condescended to by hospital consultants who expect them to act as a house officer or a medical secretary. Then the Department of Health appears to announce that a load of paramedics, nurses, physiotherapists, and pharmacists will be trained in 2 or 3 years to do their job for a fraction of the cost. I’d be pretty miffed too! But ACPs are not here to do a GP’s job, we are not a …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.