Abstract

The effect of a variety of theoretical methods (HF, B3-LYP, MP2, QCISD, and CCSD(T)) and basis sets (from 6-31G(d) to 6-311+G(3df,2p)) on the calculated geometry and dimerization energy of the acetylene−ammonia dimer HCCH···NH3 is examined. The dimer has C3v symmetry with acetylene acting as the hydrogen bond donor. Our highest level calculations (viz. CCSD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2p) including BSSE correction) predict an equilibrium contact distance r(H···N) of 2.280 Å and an equilibrium binding energy ΔEe of 14.1 kJ mol-1. Incorporation of a scaled B3-LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p) zero-point vibrational correction leads to ΔE0 = 9.3 kJ mol-1. The less expensive CCSD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2p)//B3-LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p) procedure reproduces these benchmark energies and is therefore recommended for general application on small hydrogen-bonded systems. For larger hydrogen-bonded systems, the still less expensive B3-LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p)//B3-LYP/6-311+G(d,p) procedure is recommended, and this yields ΔE0 = 7.8 kJ mol-1 for the acetylene−ammonia dimer.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call