Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the differences in the accuracy of winter wheat identification using remote sensing data at different growth stages using the same methods. Part of northern Henan Province, China was taken as the study area, and the winter wheat growth cycle was divided into five periods (seeding-tillering, overwintering, reviving, jointing-heading, and flowering-maturing) based on monitoring data obtained from agrometeorological stations. With the help of the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, the separability between winter wheat and other land cover types was analyzed and compared using the Jeffries-Matusita (J-M) distance method. Spectral features, vegetation index, water index, building index, texture features, and terrain features were generated from Sentinel-2 remote sensing images at different growth periods, and then were used to establish a random forest classification and extraction model. A deep U-Net semantic segmentation model based on the red, green, blue, and near-infrared bands of Sentinel-2 imagery was also established. By combining models with field data, the identification of winter wheat was carried out and the difference between the accuracy of the identification in the five growth periods was analyzed. The experimental results show that, using the random forest classification method, the best separability between winter wheat and the other land cover types was achieved during the jointing-heading period: the overall identification accuracy for the winter wheat was then highest at 96.90% and the kappa coefficient was 0.96. Using the deep-learning classification method, it was also found that the semantic segmentation accuracy of winter wheat and the model performance were best during the jointing-heading period: a precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy, and IoU of 0.94, 0.93, 0.93, and 0.88, respectively, were achieved for this period. Based on municipal statistical data for winter wheat, the accuracy of the extraction of the winter wheat area using the two methods was 96.72% and 88.44%, respectively. Both methods show that the jointing-heading period is the best period for identifying winter wheat using remote sensing and that the identification made during this period is reliable. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for accurately obtaining the area planted with winter wheat and for further studies into winter wheat growth monitoring and yield estimation.

Highlights

  • As well as being the most widely distributed food crop in the world, with more than40% of the world’s population relying on it as their staple food, wheat plays an important role in food production and supply, providing about 20% of overall human energy consumption [1,2]

  • The J-M distance was selected in Google Earth Engine (GEE) to calculate the separability between winter wheat and the other land-cover types during different growth periods

  • These results show that the jointing-heading period is the optimum period for distinguishing winter wheat from the other land-cover types

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As well as being the most widely distributed food crop in the world, with more than40% of the world’s population relying on it as their staple food, wheat plays an important role in food production and supply, providing about 20% of overall human energy consumption [1,2]. Obtaining the area planted with winter wheat and its spatial distribution timely and accurately is an important part of agricultural monitoring and is very important to estimates of the winter wheat yield, ensuring food security, adjusting the structure of agriculture, the formulation of agricultural policies, and the promotion of agricultural production [5,6,7,8,9]. The traditional method of obtaining details of the area planted with winter wheat depended mainly on statistical reports. This was time-consuming and laborious, and influenced by subjective human factors, which could lead to large discrepancies in the results. With the rapid development of satellite remote sensing technology, new opportunities for monitoring winter wheat have become available

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call