Abstract
To measure the accuracy and consistency of a standardized method--retrospective chart review (RCR)--for estimating nosocomial infection rates (NIRs) in individual hospitals, the authors performed a series of pilot studies in four hospitals of different types. In comparison with a standard based on diagnoses made by physician-epidemiologists supervising intensive prospective data collection teams, the RCR method was found to have an average sensitivity of 0.74 (+/- 0.02 SE; range 0.69-0.78) and an average specificity of 0.964 (+/- 0.002; 0.945-0.991). These values were comparable to those of the physician-epidemiologists' diagnoses and varied less among the hospitals. Two independent teams of chart reviewers were found to have similar levels of sensitivity and specificity, and the reliability of diagnosis at the level of the individual chart reviewer averaged 0.94. In a restudy at one of the pilot hospitals at the midpoint of the actual Medical Records Survey (MRS), there was a substantial increase in sensitivityand a slight increase in specificity as a result of improvements made in the RCR method after the original pilot studies.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
