Abstract

The invasive intra-arterial approach is the gold standard for measuring blood pressure in intensive care units where accuracy is crucial. However, invasive procedures increase the risk of infections and mortality. This evidence-based review aimed to determine whether continuous non-invasive blood pressure (CNIBP) monitoring, using Radial Artery Applanation Tonometry (RAAT) devices, is as accurate as invasive methods. Six papers were included: three prospective cohort studies and three comparative studies. Most studies showed that mean arterial pressure is accurately recorded through RAAT monitoring; however, more research is needed to assess the accuracy of non-invasive readings of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, as data are not always concordant.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call